Petitions

Tuesday 30th April 2024

(1 month, 3 weeks ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Tuesday 30 April 2024

Road safety at the junction of B671 from Elton village onto the A605

Tuesday 30th April 2024

(1 month, 3 weeks ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the United Kingdom,
Declares deep concern regarding the ongoing hazards at the junction of B671 from Elton village onto the A605, which has seen a distressing history of road traffic accidents and fatalities; further that the lack of safety measures, such as a roundabout, speed restrictions, or traffic lights, raises significant alarm; notes that despite existing cameras monitoring an average speed of 60MPH, accidents persist, highlighting the inadequacy of current measures; further that urgent reconsideration of installing traffic lights and speed restrictions is imperative, not only for local residents’ safety but also for commuters on the A605; further notes that given the success of traffic lights at the Barnwell A605 junction and their cost-effectiveness, their implementation should be swiftly considered; further declares that the financial and emotional toll of accidents, spanning back to the bypass construction in 1990, underscores the urgency for action; further notes that over the past two decades, our community has endured tragic losses from road accidents, with the first recorded in 2000, and the resulting injuries, fatalities, property damages, and strain on law enforcement and medical resources have been extensive, estimated to cost hundreds of thousands of pounds; further declares that immediate improvements are overdue, and we implore the authorities to prioritise the necessary measures to safeguard our roads and communities; and further that the introduction of the Elton bypass neglected pedestrian safety entirely, evidenced by the hazardous crossing conditions at the public footpaths.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to put pressure on the county council responsible and ask that this matter be addressed promptly, and consider appropriate measures to ensure the safety of local residents and commuters at the junction of B671 from Elton village onto the A605.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Official Report, 18 April 2024; Vol. 748, c. 13P.]
[P002958]
Observations from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport (Guy Opperman):
I was sorry to hear of the residents’ concern about ongoing hazards at the junction of the B671 from Elton village on to the A605.
Local authorities have a duty under section 122 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 to exercise their functions under the Act so as to secure the expeditious, convenient and safe movement of vehicular and other traffic (including pedestrians), so far as practicable having regard to various matters including the amenity of the area through which the road runs.
Local authorities are free to make their own decisions about the roads under their care, provided they take account of the relevant legislation. It would be inappropriate for the Government to seek to intervene in the process of local democratic accountability.
The Department issues guidance to local traffic authorities designed to make sure that speed limits are appropriately and consistently set while allowing for flexibility to deal with local circumstances. The guidance can be found online at www.gov.uk/government/publications/setting-local-speed-limits This guidance is not mandatory and the final decision is for the authority, working with the police who would carry out any enforcement.
Traffic lights may be installed if a junction has a poor safety record, and traffic authorities should develop policies and criteria to enable them to objectively assess the need for traffic signals at sites, taking into account any local relevant factors. Whether traffic lights should be used is entirely a matter for each traffic authority to consider. The Department has published guidance to assist them in chapter 6 of the “Traffic Signs Manual”, available at www.gov.uk/government/publications/traffic-signs-manual

Barclays Bank closure in Suffolk

Tuesday 30th April 2024

(1 month, 3 weeks ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of Suffolk Coastal and the wider Suffolk area,
Declares that Barclays Bank has stated it will close its Leiston branch; further that this means Barclays will have closed all of its branches in Suffolk Coastal including Aldeburgh, Felixstowe, Halesworth, Martlesham Heath, Saxmundham, Southwold and Woodbridge; further that the petitioners believe that rural areas like Suffolk are more likely to be at risk of bank closures; further recognises the powers of the Financial Conduct Authority given under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 regarding access to cash and bank closures; and further that it is concerned at the validity of the assessment of the justification of closure by Barclays.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urges the Government to encourage Barclays to keep open their last remaining branch in Leiston is Suffolk Coastal; and to require the Financial Conduct Authority to publish its assessment of the justification given by Barclays for closure of its Leiston Branch.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Dr Thérèse Coffey, Official Report, 20 March 2024; Vol. 747, c. 1013.]
[P002936]
Observations from the Economic Secretary to the Treasury (Bim Afolami):
I thank my right hon. Friend the Member for Suffolk Coastal (Dr Coffey) for submitting the petition on behalf of her constituents regarding the closure of the Leiston branch of Barclays. I am sorry to hear of her constituents’ disappointment at the planned closure of the branch. The Government believe that all customers, wherever they live, should have appropriate access to banking and cash services, and I would like to assure her that I am monitoring this issue closely. Banks and building societies occupy a privileged position in society and are essential to enabling people to manage their money on a day-to-day basis.
The Government legislated through the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 to introduce a new legislative framework to protect access to cash for individuals and businesses. This establishes the Financial Conduct Authority as the lead regulator for access to cash and provides it with responsibility and powers to seek to ensure reasonable provision of cash withdrawal and deposit facilities. As part of this responsibility, the FCA must seek to ensure that there is reasonable provision of free withdrawal and deposit facilities in relation to personal current accounts. The FCA recently consulted on its proposed regulatory regime: FCA consultation on access to cash.
For access to banking services more broadly, while the Government acknowledge that decisions to open or close a branch are commercial decisions for banks, it is imperative that banks and building societies recognise the needs of all their customers, including those who need to use in-person services. The impact of branch closures must be mitigated where possible so that all customers, wherever they live, continue to have appropriate access to banking services.
Guidance from the FCA sets out its expectation of firms when they are deciding to reduce the number of their physical branches or free-to-use ATMs. Under this guidance, firms are expected to communicate their decision to close a branch clearly to their customers and other relevant stakeholders at least 12 weeks before the proposed closure. Before this, firms are expected to conduct analysis of the needs of customers using the site, the impact of a planned closure and alternatives that are or could reasonably be put in place to continue to meet those customers’ needs. The FCA expects this analysis to include usage trends, overall transaction volumes across a representative time period, and details of any commercial evaluation the firm has completed. Firms are expected to publish a high-level summary of this analysis, though the FCA does not expect firms to publish information that is confidential.
Alternative options to access everyday banking services can be via telephone banking, through digital means such as mobile or online banking, and via the Post Office or banking hubs. The Post Office allows personal and business customers to carry out everyday banking services at 11,500 post office branches across the UK, and banking hubs are a shared initiative which enable customers of participating banks to access cash and banking services in shared facilities. Over 100 banking hubs have been announced so far and UK Finance recently confirmed that it estimates that a total of 225 banking hub locations will be announced by the end of 2024. Over 40 hubs have already opened, and the Government hope to see the other hubs open as soon as possible. In an Adjournment debate on 24 April 2024, I stated that I would like the criteria to be adjusted to better take the needs of rural areas into account.
Following my recent discussions the with the banking sector, I welcome the participating high street banks’ voluntary commitments to a range of improvements to the banking services provided in hubs. This includes all firms agreeing to provide a consistent range of banking services in hubs, and that customers will not need to bring their own smart device to carry out a service. Firms will trial customer liaison services and Saturday openings, and have also committed to keep services in banking hubs under review, ensuring hubs continue to be fit for purpose for all customers.
I thank my right hon. Friend for highlighting the concerns of her constituents in this area.