Petitions

Monday 8th January 2024

(4 months, 1 week ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Monday 8 January 2024

Home to school transport in Thrapston and surrounding villages

Monday 8th January 2024

(4 months, 1 week ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the United Kingdom,
Declares that under North Norhamptonshire’s current “Home to School Transport” policy, parents sending their children to Prince William School in Oundle may be required to pay for a substantial bus fare, which is currently free; further declares that parents in Thrapston and Islip have historically sent their children to Prince William School, a link which is appreciated and cherished by parents and schools alike; notes that the new policy will fund school buses for secondary school students to their nearest suitable school, rather than “linked” schools like the Prince William School.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to take immediate action to ensure that North Northamptonshire Council makes special arrangements outside their adopted policy to duplicate the current provision for home to school transport for Thrapston and Islip children.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Official Report, 17 October 2023; Vol. 738, c. 7P.]
[P002862]
Observations from the Minister for Schools (Damian Hinds):
Our home to school travel policy aims to make sure no child is prevented from accessing education by a lack of transport. The law requires local authorities to arrange free travel for children who attend their nearest school and cannot walk there due to the distance, their special educational needs, disability or mobility problem, or because the nature of the route means it would be unsafe for them to do so. If a child’s nearest school is full and unable to offer them a place, the nearest school that can offer them a place becomes their nearest school for transport purposes.
Where a parent chooses a school for their child that is not their nearest, they will normally be responsible for arranging their travel. There is an exception to this for children eligible for free school meals or whose parents claim the maximum amount of working tax credit. Children aged 11 to 16 are entitled to free transport to one of their three nearest schools provided it is between 2 and 6 miles from their home, or to a school their parents have chosen on the grounds of their religion or belief that is between 2 and 15 miles from their home.
Local authorities have the discretion to make travel arrangements, free or otherwise, for other children, but they are not required to do so. We know that budget pressures mean local authorities often have to make difficult decisions to balance the benefits of discretionary travel with their other priorities.
North Northamptonshire Council uses its discretionary power to provide free transport to Prince William School for children living in Thrapston or Islip. The council had proposed withdrawing this transport but, on 26 October, it posted a notice on its website to say that it will not be doing so: “Secondary school children in Thrapston and Islip to keep statutory free bus travel to Prince William School” (North Northamptonshire Council, northnorthants.gov.uk).
Further information about home to school travel is available in our statutory guidance for local authorities here: www.gov.uk/government/publications/home-to-school-travel-and-transport-guidance.

Botley West Solar Farm

Monday 8th January 2024

(4 months, 1 week ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of Witney and West Oxfordshire,
Declares that the large scale solar farm application known as “Botley West Solar Farm” is detrimental to the local community, notes that its scale and design are incompatible with the current infrastructure of the area; further declares that preservation of farmland for food security, local amenity, rural character and green belt preservation must take precedence when considering solar farm applications.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to reject the application when it is presented and immediately update the National Planning Policy Framework to give clearer, stricter guidance on the appropriate location, scale and design of solar farm including the definition to be used when sites are declared to be “temporary”, furthermore that this updated guidance give weight to factors such as the preservation of farmland for food security, local amenity, overall scale and impact upon the local community, rural character and green belt preservation.—[Presented by Robert Courts, Official Report, 24 October 2023; Vol. 738, c. 804.]
[P002866]
Observations from the Energy Security and Net Zero (Lord Callanan):
The proposed Botley West solar farm is currently in the pre-application stage of the planning process set out under the Planning Act 2008. This stage of the planning process, including the consultation process, is developer-led. The Planning Inspectorate’s project page for the proposal states that the application is expected to be submitted to the Planning Inspectorate in quarter 4 of 2023.
Once the pre-application stage is completed and the application is officially received by the Planning Inspectorate, it has 28 days to review the application and to decide whether or not to accept it for examination. It is important to note that when deciding if an application should be accepted for examination, the Planning Inspectorate considers whether an applicant has complied with the pre-application procedure. The adequacy of an applicant’s pre-application consultation has a significant bearing on whether an application is considered to be of a satisfactory standard to be accepted for examination. It is also important to note that the panel of inspectors that will conduct the examination of the proposal, should the application be submitted to the Planning Inspectorate as planned, are appointed by the Planning Inspectorate, without involvement from the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero.
The Department understands that the developer intends to undertake a second phase of community consultation in autumn 2023. We would encourage the petitioners to engage with that consultation process and to utilise it as an opportunity to raise concerns.
Should the application be successfully accepted for examination by the Planning Inspectorate once submitted, we would encourage the petitioners to register as an interested party and to engage with the examination process.
Given the role of the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero in determining applications for development consent, to avoid prejudicing the decision-making process the Department cannot comment on specific concerns regarding a proposed infrastructure project. However, the petitioners should be assured that in taking the decision, the Secretary of State will follow the relevant requirements in the Planning Act 2008 and have regard to a wide range of matters relevant to her decision.
With regards to updating the National Planning Policy Framework, we would encourage the petitioners to share their views with the Department for Levelling Up, Communities and Housing, as that is the Department responsible for the NPPF.

Public Service Obligation routes

Monday 8th January 2024

(4 months, 1 week ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the constituency of Blackpool South,
Declares that the Government should consider reform of the Public Service Obligation routes to support regional Airports such as Blackpool.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to take into account the concerns of the petitioners and take immediate action to ensure that local airports such as Blackpool are supported.
And the petitioners remain, etc. —[Presented by Scott Benton, Official Report, 12 December 2023; Vol. 742, c. 867.]
[P002886]
Observations from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport (Anthony Browne):
I recognise the importance of regional airports such as Blackpool to the areas that they serve. Regional airports serve our local communities, by supporting thousands of jobs in the regions and acting as a gateway to international opportunities, alongside maintaining social and family ties and strengthening the bonds between the four nations. The UK aviation market operates predominately in the private sector. Airports invest in their infrastructure to attract passengers and airlines, while airlines are well placed to deliver services to their customers by responding to demand for different routes.
I am pleased to advise that on 7 December 2023, the Government announced reforms to our public service obligation (PSO) policy as part of our response to the Union connectivity review by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill. We have improved PSO policy to allow PSOs to operate to and from different regions of the UK, rather than just to and from London as was previously the case, supporting our connectivity and levelling-up objectives.
I must stress that PSO policy is designed to support, where needed, routes that have previously been operated commercially, or are now at risk of being lost. PSO policy does not support new routes and is only available to routes that have no viable transport alternatives.
The relevant local authority is responsible for identifying the need for a PSO and presenting its case to the Department for Transport. If my Department considers there to be a need for a PSO on a specific route, the local authority must also hold a full and open tender to select an airline to operate the route on an exclusive basis.
My Department has not received any representations from the local authority concerning a potential PSO route from Blackpool airport. My officials remain available and would be happy to guide the relevant officials through the guidance and the application process.
The Department also continues to consider the ways in which PSOs, alongside other policy measures, could help us to meet our regional connectivity and levelling-up objectives.