All 3 Petitions debates in the Commons on 1st Mar 2023


Tue 28th Feb 2023

House of Commons (30) - Commons Chamber (12) / Westminster Hall (6) / Written Statements (4) / Petitions (3) / Ministerial Corrections (2) / Public Bill Committees (2) / General Committees (1)

House of Lords (14) - Lords Chamber (11) / Grand Committee (3)


Thu 2nd Mar 2023
Share Page

Wed 1st Mar 2023
Petitions
Petitions
Wed 1st Mar 2023
Child Support Act
Petitions
Wed 1st Mar 2023
Detachment of Earnings Orders
Petitions

Petitions

Wednesday 1st March 2023

(1 year, 8 months ago)

Petitions
Share Debate
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Wednesday 1 March 2023
Return to start of debate - Return to top of page

Child Support Act

Wednesday 1st March 2023

(1 year, 8 months ago)

Petitions
Share Debate
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of Craig Bulman,
Declares that the petitioner is concerned with section 33 of the Child Support Act 1991 and its compatibility with Article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998; notes that the Child Maintenance Service (CMS) is securing liability orders for debts that are not owed and are in dispute; further notes that no evidence is provided by the CMS to substantiate the debt is owed by the paying parent, further declares that Section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 states that it is unlawful for a public authority to act in a way which is incompatible with a convention right.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to address these concerns surrounding section 33 of the Child Support Act 1991 and its compatibility with Article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998.
And the petitioners remain, etc.
[P002808]
Return to start of debate - Return to top of page

Detachment of Earnings Orders

Wednesday 1st March 2023

(1 year, 8 months ago)

Petitions
Share Debate
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of Craig Bulman,
Declares that the Child Maintenance Service’s current policy on the enforcement of Detachment of Earnings Orders is not in accordance with the principles it should apply; notes that the CMS must provide factual evidence to the Paying Parents employer and Bank Manager that arrears are owed before such enforcement can commence; further notes that if arrears are in dispute DEO’s must not be enforced bank accounts must not be garnished and liability orders must not be granted; furthermore that the burden of proof lies upon the accuser to prove with factual evidence that a debt is owed by the Paying Parent.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to take into account the concerns of the petitioner and work with the Child Maintenance Service to prevent the improper use of the Detachment of Earnings Orders.
And the petitioners remain, etc.
[P002809]
Return to start of debate - Return to top of page