Petitions

Tuesday 2nd July 2019

(4 years, 9 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Tuesday 2 July 2019

Nnamani family, Glasgow

Tuesday 2nd July 2019

(4 years, 9 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of Glasgow South West
Declares that Mary Nnamani and her family who fled from Nigeria in danger of their lives have become a full and valued part of our community in Glasgow through our schools and Church Community; further that the Nnamani family have claimed asylum here and we would dearly love them to say.
The petitions, therefore, request that the House of Commons urges the Home Office to grant Mary Nnamani and her family the right to remain in this country, where they have claimed asylum.
And the petitioners remain, etc. —[Presented by Chris Stephens , Official Report, 5 June 2019; Vol. 661, c. 235 .]
[P002459]
Petitions in the same terms were presented by the hon. Member for Glasgow Central (Alison Thewliss) [P002460]; the hon. Member for Glasgow North (Patrick Grady) [P002461]; the hon. Member for Glasgow North East Paul Sweeney) [P002462]; the hon. Member for Glasgow East (David Linden) [P002474].
Observations from The Minister for Immigration (Caroline Nokes):
The Government have noted the concerns raised by the residents of Glasgow South West, Glasgow Central, Glasgow North, Glasgow North East and Glasgow East and their request that Mary Nnamani and her family are allowed to continue to live in the UK where she has claimed asylum.
The Government cannot comment on individual cases, because doing so would breach their obligations to treat such personal matters in confidence.
The Government have a proud record of providing protection for those who genuinely need it, in accordance with our international obligations under the Refugee Convention and the European Convention on Human Rights. Every asylum claim is carefully considered on its individual merits, by assessing all the evidence provided by the claimant against policy, relevant caselaw and available country information from a wide range of recognised and publicly disclosable sources. These include the UN and its agencies, governments, the media and human rights organisations, such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
The Government will grant protection where someone demonstrates that they face persecution or serious harm in their country and they are unable to seek protection from the national authorities or move to another part of their country to live safely. The Government are very clear that we do not return anyone who faces persecution or serious harm to their country or where there will be a breach of its obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights.
There is also provision in the Home Office policy on Discretionary Leave to allow people to stay in the UK on a discretionary basis, where they do not qualify for protection, but where there are other exceptional circumstances such that expecting them to return to their country would not be appropriate.
Where a decision has been made that a person does not require international protection, and there are no remaining rights of appeal or obstacles to their return, the Home Office expects failed asylum seekers to return voluntarily to their home country. Return and reintegration assistance is available through the Home Office’s Voluntary Returns Service. If they do not leave voluntarily, the Government will seek to enforce their removal.
Where an asylum claim has been refused, but an individual subsequently obtains new information in support of their claim to be at risk of persecution, or that would support a claim to be allowed to remain in the UK on the basis of their private of family life here, the Home Office will ensure that the new information is carefully considered. Enforcement action will not proceed until a decision has been made on any fresh evidence submitted.

Yamuna River

Tuesday 2nd July 2019

(4 years, 9 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the United Kingdom ,
Declares that the Yamuna is worshipped by millions and is considered a holy river; the residents of the United Kingdom recognise the work of the Save Yamuna campaign and request that the British Prime Minister work with the Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi, and the Indian Government to treat their industrial and domestic waste and not pour treated or untreated waste water into the Yamuna river and necessarily ensure that adequate natural flow of fresh water throughout the stretch, which starts from Yamunotri to Allahabad.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urges the Government to assist the Indian Government and take into consideration that there is a dire need to save the Yamuna river and remove toxic waste.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Keith Vaz , Official Report, 4 June 2019; Vol. 661, c. 2P.]
[P002453]
Observations from theMinister of State, Department for International Development (Harriett Baldwin):
The impact of pollution from waste, industrial chemicals and plastic is having an impact on all of us, disproportionately affecting the poorest communities in the world. Declining water quality is a significant challenge faced by many developing countries and this, amongst other challenges such as floods and droughts, contributes to ill health and poverty. Like the Petitioners, the Department for International Development (DFID) champions the importance of saving our natural resources and combating toxic waste. We note with particular concern the drought currently affecting millions of people in India.
While we do not currently work on decontamination of the Yamuna river specifically, DFID has a number of programmes that focus on water pollution such as our Water Security Programme, which helps developing countries to promote sustainable and responsible water management and to bring together industries, communities and Governments to take collective action to address challenges such as pollution.
India’s Department of Science and Technology (DST), the UK’s Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) have funded a joint programme on India-UK water quality to develop understanding of the sources and fate of different pollutants, and by supporting the development of management strategies and technologies to reduce pollution levels. The UK contributes £4.2 million to this programme, which is then matched in research by DST. The aim of this programme is to provide policymakers, regulators, businesses and local communities with information and solutions that will help them tackle India’s water quality issues and secure the provision of clear water, rejuvenate rivers, and restore ecosystems. This will be achieved by supporting research to improve understanding of the sources, transport, transportation, interactions and fate of pollutants, and determine the risks they pose to both people and the environment. Importantly, the joint programme will also develop new management strategies and technologies to clean-up water courses and enable better monitoring of pollution levels.
India’s Department of Biotechnology (DBT), UKRI’s Innovate UK, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) are working on a joint programme (worth £9.9 million) through the Newton Bhabha Fund on Biotechnological Solutions for tackling industrial waste and facilitating academic and industrial collaboration to help address industrial waste. This programme also aims to improve value recovery from waste by using biotechnology across large industrial sectors in India. Projects supported by the programme are exploring a number of approaches to help cut waste and pollution—for example: using bio-refining techniques to recover value from industrial, waste; transforming mixed solid waste into high-value chemical products; turning paper-mill waste into chemical wealth; cutting waste produced by sugarcane processing; and extracting value from waste generated by the sugarcane sector and associated industries.