Petitions

Monday 1st September 2014

(9 years, 10 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Monday 1 September 2014

Development Proposals for 34 Hatton Avenue, Wellingborough

Monday 1st September 2014

(9 years, 10 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The Humble Petition of residents of Hatton Park, Northamptonshire and the surrounding areas,
Sheweth,
That the Petitioners believe that the proposed change of use of 34 Hatton Avenue, Wellingborough into a behavioural management home (application number WP/14/00385/COU) is unacceptable as the location of the development is unsuitable both for the proposed residents of the home and for the local residents.
Wherefore your Petitioners pray that your Honourable House urges the Department for Communities and Local Government, and the Borough Council of Wellingborough to work together to reject the current application and relocate it to a more suitable site.
And your Petitioners, as in duty bound, will ever pray, &c.—[Presented by Mr Peter Bone, Official Report, 22 July 2014; Vol. 584, c. 1357 .]
[P001381]
Observations from the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, received 6 August 2014:
The Borough Council of Wellingborough is responsible for the day-to-day planning of their area. The Government’s policy is not to interfere with the jurisdiction of a local planning authority unless it is necessary to do so. In determining a planning application a local planning authority is required to have regard to all material considerations including the development plan, national policies and views expressed by third parties.
The Government are committed to giving more power to councils and communities to make their own decisions on planning issues, and believe that planning decisions should be made at the local level wherever possible. Calling-in a planning application removes councils from the decision-making process. We, therefore, exercise the power sparingly, with only 12 applications called in during 2013.
The Secretary of State has carefully considered this case against call-in policy, as set out in the Written Ministerial Statement by the Minister for Skills and Enterprise, the hon. Member for Grantham and Stamford (Nick Boles) on 26 October 2012. The policy makes it clear that the power to call in a planning application will only be used very selectively. While the Secretary of State recognises that there is local concern about the proposal, he has decided having had regard to this policy, that taking the decision away from the council is not justified. He is satisfied that the application should be determined at a local level.

Freezing of Bank Accounts

Monday 1st September 2014

(9 years, 10 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The Petition of Miss Enid L. Gibson, living in England a woman of 94 years of age who worked as a midwife and every branch of nursing,
Declares that her bank accounts have been frozen and money taken by Redbridge London Borough and she is not being allowed to publicly complain. Furthermore she has not been allowed to address the court and local authority are trying to stop her visiting Parliament.
The Petitioner therefore requests that the House of Commons Justice Committee and the Government change the law to stop this happening.
And the Petitioner remains, etc.—[Presented by John Hemming, Official Report, 19 March 2014; Vol. 577, c. 5P .]
[P001335]
Observations from the Secretary of State for Justice, received 22 August 2014:
The Mental Capacity Act 2005 empowers individuals to make their own decisions or to maximise their participation in any decision-making process. The underlying philosophy of the Act is to make sure that any decision made or action taken on behalf of someone who lacks capacity to act for themselves is made in their best interests. But the Act also aims to balance an individual’s right to make a decision for themselves with their right to be protected from harm if they lack capacity to make a decision to protect themselves.
The Government cannot comment on the individual circumstances of the Petitioner’s case, the questions raised and the actions taken by the Local Authority which have been subject to court proceedings and where judgments have been delivered. These decisions are for independent judges to make, on the basis of the facts in each particular case.
The Government endorse the position that parties should be able to assert their rights to the full extent of their capacity, whether in public or by engaging with elected representatives, subject always to any directions of the courts. Furthermore, if a party does in fact lack capacity to make certain decisions, it is important that they are able to continue asserting their rights through the courts (or indeed defending their position) and do not lose that opportunity through the lack of capacity.

Bingo Duty

Monday 1st September 2014

(9 years, 10 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The Petition of the people of Suffolk Coastal,
Declares that the bingo industry is currently subjected to bingo duty at 20% whereas most other forms of gambling are taxed at 15% and further that the Petitioners believe that bingo venues offer a pleasant and safe environment for people to come together and enjoy themselves.
The Petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urges the Government to reduce bingo duty from 20% to 15% so investment can take place in the bingo industry modernising premises and creating jobs.
And the Petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Dr Thérèse Coffey, Official Report, 17 March 2014; Vol. 577, c. 614 .]
[P001332]
Observations from the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Treasury, received 25 July 2014:
The petitioners have requested that the House of Commons urges the Government to reduce bingo duty from 20% to 15% so investment can take place in the bingo industry modernising premises and creating jobs. [HMRC observes that] the Chancellor made an announcement in his Budget speech to reduce the rate to 10%.
In his speech the Chancellor said:
“While betting machines have grown, the number of bingo halls has plummeted by three quarters over the last thirty years.
Yet bingo duty has been set at the high rate of 20%.
Now fuel duty is frozen, my Honourable Friend for Harlow has turned his energy and talent into a vigorous campaign to cut bingo duty—ably assisted by my Honourable Friend for Waveney.
They want the rate cut to 15%.
I can go further.
Bingo duty will be halved to 10% to protect jobs and protect communities.”
The rate of bingo duty was reduced to 10% for bingo duty accounting periods beginning on or 30 June 2014.

Proposed Closure of the NatWest Branch on Splott Road, Cardiff

Monday 1st September 2014

(9 years, 10 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The Petition of residents of the UK,
Declares that the Petitioners wish to protest against the closure of the NatWest branch on Splott Road, Cardiff, in the constituency of Cardiff South and Penarth and further that a local Petition on this subject has received nearly 300 signatures.
The Petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons notes the Petition and urges the Government to hold talks with representatives of NatWest to consider the impacts of the branch closure on the local community.
And the Petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Stephen Doughty, Official Report, 14 May 2014; Vol. 580, c. 858.]
[P001354]
Observations from the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Treasury, received 25 July 2014:
The Government thank the Member for Cardiff South and Penarth (Stephen Doughty) for his petition on the closure of the NatWest bank branch on Splott Road, Cardiff.
The Government are sorry to hear about the disappointment of the residents of Cardiff South and Penarth at the closure of this NatWest branch. Although we can understand their concerns, decisions on opening and closing branches are taken by the management team of each bank on a commercial basis. As with other banking service providers, NatWest will need to balance customer interests, market competition, and other commercial factors when considering its strategy, and the Government do not seek to intervene in these decisions.
It may be useful to note that many bank account providers already have an arrangement with the Post Office to provide access to their bank accounts, where customers can withdraw money, deposit cash and cheques and check balances at all 11,500 Post Office branches in the UK.
It is vitally important that the banking sector serves the wider economy, and the Government are committed to increasing competition to deliver innovation, and good financial products and services for all banking customers.

Rural Fuel Rebate in Cornwall

Monday 1st September 2014

(9 years, 10 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The Petition of residents of the UK,
Declares that there are currently proposals to extend the rural fuel rebate scheme to Cornwall, initially by five pence per litre.
The Petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urges the Government and the European Commission to fully back the plan and to introduce it as soon as they can.
And the Petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Andrew George, Official Report, 4 December 2013; Vol. 571, c. 1050 .]
[P001307]
Observations from the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Treasury, received 15 August 2014:
The Government thank the Member for St Ives (Andrew George) for his petition regarding the rural fuel duty rebate scheme, and apologises for the administrative errors which have led to this extremely delayed response.
In August 201 3, the Government announced their intention to seek permission from the European Commission to extend the island rural fuel rebate scheme to remote rural areas of the UK mainland. Following this announcement, the Government launched a Call for Information inviting remote rural service stations in a number of areas across the UK to submit data on their pump prices. However, as not all retailers were able to provide this information in the time available, the Government launched a supplementary Call for Information in November 201 3, which closed in December.
The Government used the data received through both Calls for Information, as well as data previously held by HMRC, to determine the list of areas to be included in the application to the European Commission, which was submitted in January 2014.
In order to make the strongest possible case to the European Commission, the Government considered that the areas selected should experience similar characteristics to the islands in the current rural fuel rebate scheme. In particular, the Government considered it was necessary to demonstrate that high prices in the areas selected are due to objective factors such as remoteness and transport costs. The selection criteria used are set out below:
1. Pump Price Threshold: Pump prices in selected areas are consistently more expensive than the lowest pump price on the islands in the existing scheme.
2. Cost of Transporting Fuel: Shortlisted areas are over 100 miles by road from the nearest refinery, so transport costs are likely to be substantially above average in these areas.
3. Population Density: The population density of included areas is no higher than any island in the current scheme.
The Government are aware that you will be disappointed that areas in West Cornwall did not make the final list, but would like to reassure you of their commitment to support rural areas with the price of fuel. At Autumn Statement 2013, the Government cancelled the fuel duty increase that was planned for 1 September 2014, freezing fuel duty for the remainder of parliament. As a result of this Government’s action on fuel duty since 2011, pump prices are currently 16ppl (pence per litre) lower than under the previous Government’s fuel duty plans, and will be nearly 20ppl lower by the end of the Parliament.

The Proposed Closure of the Santander Branch on Downing Drive (Evington, Leicester)

Monday 1st September 2014

(9 years, 10 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The Petition of residents of Leicester East,
Declares that the proposed closure of the Santander Branch on Downing Drive in Evington will have an extremely negative impact on elderly residents in the area who use the branch.
The Petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urges the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills to meet with representatives of Santander to examine the impact of branch closures on local residents.
And the Petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Keith Vaz, Official Report, 6 May 2014; Vol. 580, c. 122 .]
[P001347]
Observations from the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Treasury, received 25 July 2014:
The Government thank the Member for Leicester East (Keith Vaz) for his petition on the closure of the Santander agency on Downing Drive, Evington.
The Government are sorry to hear about the disappointment of the residents of Leicester East at the closure of this Santander agency. Although we can understand their concerns, decisions on opening and closing agencies are taken by the management team of each bank on a commercial basis. As with other banking service providers, Santander will need to balance customer interests, market competition, and other commercial factors when considering its strategy and the Government do not seek to intervene in these decisions.
It may be useful to note that many bank account providers already have an arrangement with the Post Office to provide access to their bank accounts, where customers can withdraw money, deposit cash and cheques and check balances at all 11,500 Post Office branches in the UK.
It is vitally important that the banking sector serves the wider economy, and the Government are committed to increasing competition to deliver innovation, and good financial products and services for all banking customers.