Petitions

Tuesday 4th March 2014

(10 years, 9 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Tuesday 4 March 2014

The Right of Anton Kainga to Remain in the UK

Tuesday 4th March 2014

(10 years, 9 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The Petition of residents of the UK,
Declares that the Petitioners believe that Anton Kainga, a tennis coach in Nottingham and an internationally qualified tennis professional from Malawi, who has exceptional talent and love for the sport of tennis, is unfairly being removed from the UK; further that the Petitioners believe that some members of the tennis club will suffer and will not be able to pursue their chosen career of becoming professional tennis players as a result of this decision; further that the Petitioners believe that during the 11 years he has lived in Great Britain Anton Kainga has inspired children and adults to love and play tennis; further that the Petitioners believe that Anton Kainga has inspired children, with one member of the tennis club being home-schooled so that he can commit to the game and play the qualification round of $10,000 tournaments and Anton Kainga needs to be at this child’s side for him to reach his full potential; further that the Petitioners believe that Anton Kainga is a mentor, best friend, second dad and invaluable coach to this child who understands not only this child’s tennis but his medical condition and further that the Petitioners believe that only Anton Kainga can guide this child towards his dream of a career as a professional tennis player.
The Petitioners therefore request that the Houses of Commons urges the Home Office to reconsider their decision to deport Anton Kainga and grant him the right to remain in the UK.
And the Petitioners remain, etc.
[P001327]

Residence of the Bishop of Bath and Wells

Tuesday 4th March 2014

(10 years, 9 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The Petition of residents of the UK,
Declares that the Petitioners believe that the Church Commissioners’ decision to move the Bishop of Bath and Wells from the Bishop’s Palace and Gardens is a mistake and further that a local Petition on this subject has received over 2,000 signatures.
The Petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urges the Church Commissioners to wait until the new Bishop of Bath and Wells takes up office and then reconsiders and consults on whether he should reside at Bishop’s Palace and Gardens.
And the Petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Tessa Munt, Official Report, 12 February 2014; Vol. 575, c. 980.]
[P001319]
Observations from the Church Commissioners:
The Church Commissioners note the various representations that have been made to them regarding the future living arrangements of the Bishop of Bath and Wells and the use of the Bishop’s Palace in Wells. The Board of Governors of the Church Commissioners held a discussion on the matter at their meeting on 25 February 2014. This was the first time the Board had met since the original decision of November 2013.
The members of the Board of Governors were given an opportunity to review the petition and various other representations, both in support and against their initial decision, which had been made to the Secretary of the Church Commissioners and to the Second Church Estates Commissioner, right hon. Sir Tony Baldry MP.
After detailed discussion, the Board of Governors took the decision to reaffirm its original findings. The Church Commissioners have written to the bishop’s council and standing committee of the Diocese of Bath and Wells.