To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Taxation: Electronic Government
Monday 8th April 2024

Asked by: Lord Lipsey (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask His Majesty's Government what consideration they gave to the Report from the Communications and Digital Committee Digital exclusion (3rd Report, Session 2022–23, HL Paper 219) when removing the postal address for HMRC from tax code notices.

Answered by Baroness Vere of Norbiton - Parliamentary Secretary (HM Treasury)

HMRC could not have considered the 2022-23 Communications and Digital Committee Report on Digital Exclusion when removing the postal address from tax code notices, as this change occurred over 5 years ago. In keeping with the HMRC Charter principles, the Department aims to balance digital initiatives with accessibility for those facing digital exclusion.


Written Question
Revenue and Customs: Telephone Services
Thursday 21st March 2024

Asked by: Lord Lipsey (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask His Majesty's Government what is the (1) median, and (2) upper decile, wait time for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs to answer telephone calls.

Answered by Baroness Vere of Norbiton - Parliamentary Secretary (HM Treasury)

HMRC does not report on the median or upper decile wait times for telephone calls. However, HMRC publishes data on the average speed of answer for customer calls and the percentage of calls where the customer waited more than 10 minutes.


This information can be found at the following link:

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/hmrc-monthly-performance-reports#reporting-year-2023-to-2024


Speech in Lords Chamber - Wed 20 Mar 2024
Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill

Speech Link

View all Lord Lipsey (Lab - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill

Division Vote (Lords)
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Lipsey (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 126 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 249 Noes - 219
Division Vote (Lords)
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Lipsey (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 129 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 263 Noes - 233
Division Vote (Lords)
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Lipsey (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 125 Labour Aye votes vs 2 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 209
Division Vote (Lords)
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Lipsey (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 126 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 226
Division Vote (Lords)
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Lipsey (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 129 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 230
Division Vote (Lords)
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Lipsey (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 128 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 228
Division Vote (Lords)
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Lipsey (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 124 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 251 Noes - 214