Colombia: Human Rights

Lord Bhatia Excerpts
Monday 12th July 2021

(2 years, 8 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon Portrait Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (Con) [V]
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I confirm to my noble friend that we have made representations through discussions at the United Nations. As I said, we continue to make representations through my colleague, Minister Morton, and our ambassador to Colombia.

Lord Bhatia Portrait Lord Bhatia (Non-Afl) [V]
- Hansard - -

My Lords, if reports of the killings are correct, should we not cancel the trade agreement?

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon Portrait Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (Con) [V]
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, as the noble Lord may recollect, the trade agreement has specific articles contained within it, Articles 1 and 8, which ensure that human rights are upheld. We will continue, because Colombia is yet to ratify the trade agreement, to uphold that aspect of it. Equally, as we lend support to Colombia, it is important that we ensure improved trade and prosperity for all Colombians.

Integrated Review: Development Aid

Lord Bhatia Excerpts
Wednesday 28th April 2021

(2 years, 11 months ago)

Grand Committee
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Bhatia Portrait Lord Bhatia (Non-Afl) [V]
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I wish to say how sad it was to hear about Lord Judd’s passing away. I have lost a mentor, a good friend and a good support. It is also sad to see the cuts that have been made by the Government to their manifesto commitment. It seems that we have lost our moral compass. Millions of women and children will die as a result of these cuts. I fully support the manner in which the noble Lord, Lord Alton, alerted us to the consequences.

Domestic Animals

Lord Bhatia Excerpts
Thursday 15th April 2021

(2 years, 11 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park Portrait Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park (Con) [V]
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The noble Baroness raises an important point. Animal rescue organisations do extraordinarily valuable work, usually on a voluntary basis, and the pandemic has had a massive impact on individuals, businesses and charities caring for animals. Throughout this challenging period, we have pressed to ensure that rescue and rehoming organisations are able to stay open, that staff and volunteers can continue to work and tend to the animals in their care and that rehoming, fostering and adoption services can continue. Throughout the pandemic we have kept in very close contact with the entire sector.

Lord Bhatia Portrait Lord Bhatia (Non-Afl) [V]
- Hansard - -

Can the Minister say whether there should be fines for people who neglect or abandon their pets?

Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park Portrait Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park (Con) [V]
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am afraid to say that I did not hear the noble Lord’s full question. However, in relation to increased punishments for cruelty to animals, I can say that the Government are supporting a Bill that appears before this House tomorrow; my noble friend Lord Randall will be introducing the Sentencing Bill, and the Government support it. It will increase the maximum custodial sentence for animal cruelty from the current six months to five years, and that will enable courts to take a much firmer approach to cases such as dog fighting, the abuse of puppies and kittens and so on, and the gross neglect of farm animals. I hope that answers the noble Lord’s question.

Bahrain: Human Rights Abuses

Lord Bhatia Excerpts
Thursday 25th March 2021

(3 years ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon Portrait Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (Con) [V]
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We welcome the death penalty being abolished, and of course that remains the long-standing position of Her Majesty’s Government. We continue to raise this globally with all partners.

Lord Bhatia Portrait Lord Bhatia (Non-Afl) [V]
- Hansard - -

My Lords, can we stop all exports to Bahrain as a way out of this big dilemma?

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon Portrait Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (Con) [V]
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I think that the noble Lord talked about stopping exports. I do not believe that that is the correct way forward. Bahrain is an important partner and, as we have seen on this important yet sensitive agenda, there has been progress there. Being a critical and constructive friend is the way forward.

Bank for International Settlements (Immunities and Privileges) Order 2021

Lord Bhatia Excerpts
Wednesday 10th February 2021

(3 years, 1 month ago)

Grand Committee
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Bhatia Portrait Lord Bhatia (Non-Afl) [V]
- Hansard - -

My Lords, this SI has been prepared by the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office. The Bank of England has made a successful bid to host the Bank for International Settlements innovation hub in the UK. In order for it to operate in the UK, it is necessary to grant immunities and privileges which will be effected in the host country agreement between the UK and the BIS when it is signed. These privileges and immunities have been negotiated between the UK and the BIS in the HCA and are the most limited, consistent with the functionality of an international financial institution.

The HCA will come into force once this Order in Council has been approved. The UK has agreed to grant certain privileges and immunities for BIS officials, employees and experts, particularly those who will be located at the BIS innovation hub in the UK. The immunities will include: exemptions from national taxation; immunity from inspection or seizure of official baggage; and inviolability of official papers and documents. BIS employees and their households will also be exempt from immigration control. First, does the Minister agree that these privileges are almost the same as given to diplomats? Secondly, does he agree that these BIS employees and their families will spend considerable sums of money to buy their daily needs from local shops and, possibly, employ local staff for their offices and homes?

The UK’s Relationship with the Pacific Alliance (International Relations Committee Report)

Lord Bhatia Excerpts
Monday 1st February 2021

(3 years, 1 month ago)

Grand Committee
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Bhatia Portrait Lord Bhatia (Non-Afl) [V]
- Hansard - -

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Hague of Richmond, said in 2010 that they UK had

“a track record of underestimating Latin America and neglecting its opportunities.”

He called for the UK

“to think afresh about Latin America and the opportunities it presents for political cooperation and trade and investment that will benefit all our citizens.”

A number of countries in Latin America share the UK’s approach to free markets, democracy and the rule of law. The UK was party, as an EU member, to free trade agreements with Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru and Brazil; an agreement with Argentina is in an advanced stage of negotiations.

Enhanced engagement with Latin America will be a necessary part of the Government’s global Britain strategy. It will act as an invisible chain linking the world’s democracies. Through the Pacific Alliance, established in 2011 by Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Peru, the UK could strengthen its existing relationship with these four countries in the region.

The four countries of the Pacific Alliance account for $1.1 trillion in trade—a figure that has increased by an average of 6.7% annually for the past decade. David Gallagher, the ambassador of Chile to the UK, said that the Pacific Alliance was therefore “a very big market” for external partners. As the report states, Ambassador Gamarra said that

“the members of the Pacific Alliance shared a ‘strong projection to the Asia-Pacific region’”.

The UK Government has expressed an interest in joining this alliance after Brexit. Now that we are out of the EU, the strategy of expanding our relationship with Pacific partners, including in Latin America, must be the right thing to do.

Hazardous Substances and Packaging (Legislative Functions and Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020

Lord Bhatia Excerpts
Wednesday 9th December 2020

(3 years, 3 months ago)

Grand Committee
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Bhatia Portrait Lord Bhatia (Non-Afl) [V]
- Hansard - -

My Lords, this SI has been prepared by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. It transfers legislative functions currently conferred on the European Commission by directive 2011/65/EU of the European Parliament and the Council on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment to be exercisable instead by the Secretary of State in relation to England, Wales and Scotland after the end of the EU exit transition period. The directive requires member states to ensure that electrical and electronic equipment placed on the market does not contain certain hazardous substances.

The legislative powers conferred on the Commission by the RoHS directive are transferred into domestic law so that the list of restricted substances in EEE may be amended following reviews, and exemptions may be granted, renewed or revoked by secondary legislation. The SI transfers powers under the RoHS directive currently held by the European Commission to the Secretary of State in relation to England, Wales and Scotland. There is bound to be an impact on businesses. Can the Minister explain whether those who breach the guidelines will be fined and, if so, up to what level?

Timber and Timber Products and FLEGT (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020

Lord Bhatia Excerpts
Tuesday 27th October 2020

(3 years, 5 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Bhatia Portrait Lord Bhatia (Non-Afl) [V]
- Hansard - -

My Lords, this regulation applies to timber harvested in the EU and third countries. It imposes obligations on those who place timber or timber products on the EU internal market for the first time—

Baroness Pitkeathley Portrait The Deputy Speaker (Baroness Pitkeathley) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The House is having some difficulty hearing the noble Lord. Can you be a little closer to your microphone?

Lord Bhatia Portrait Lord Bhatia (Non-Afl) [V]
- Hansard - -

Yes. Can you hear me now? Is this better?

Baroness Penn Portrait Baroness Penn (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Please continue.

Lord Bhatia Portrait Lord Bhatia (Non-Afl) [V]
- Hansard - -

This regulation applies to timber harvested in the EU and third countries. It imposes obligations on those who place timber or timber products plus those who sell or buy these goods in the course of commercial activity. The traders must not place illegally harvested timber—

Baroness Penn Portrait Baroness Penn (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I believe there is a problem connecting to the noble Lord, Lord Bhatia. I suggest we move on and maybe return to him if we can reconnect.

INSPIRE (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020

Lord Bhatia Excerpts
Wednesday 9th September 2020

(3 years, 6 months ago)

Grand Committee
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Bhatia Portrait Lord Bhatia (Non-Afl) [V]
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I agree with what the Minister has said. The INSPIRE (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations laid on 15 October 2019 were considered by the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments. [Inaudible.]

--- Later in debate ---
Lord Russell of Liverpool Portrait The Deputy Chairman of Committees (Lord Russell of Liverpool) (CB)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I understand that the sound issues have now been sorted out, so I again call the noble Lord, Lord Bhatia.

Lord Russell of Liverpool Portrait The Deputy Chairman of Committees (Lord Russell of Liverpool) (CB)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Lord Bhatia, I am afraid that we still have major problems understanding you. The problem has not been resolved. We will try to come back to you; the staff will try to do that. I call the noble Baroness, Lady Bakewell of Hardington Mandeville.

Global Human Rights Sanctions Regulations 2020

Lord Bhatia Excerpts
Wednesday 29th July 2020

(3 years, 8 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Bhatia Portrait Lord Bhatia (Non-Afl) [V]
- Hansard - -

My Lords, this SI is intended to detail and provide accountability for activities which, if carried out by or on behalf of a state, would amount to a serious violation of human rights by that state. It will rightly allow the Secretary of State to impose asset freezing and travel bans on persons involved in such conduct. The Government rightly seek to champion human rights. We are hearing from the media that there have been increasing violations of human rights in China, Burma, Bangladesh and other countries. We are informed that the Government have made representations to all such countries that have breached human rights conventions.

I wish to focus on the suffering of women and children when human rights are breached. There are regular reports of rape by soldiers and other predators. Children are abducted for slavery and sex abuse. The Government must make representations, through the UN and other countries, to Governments who have breached human rights. Asset freezing, trade sanctions and travel bans should be brought into effect. The Government need to go much further to ensure that we achieve a robust and fit-for-purpose independent sanctions regime. Finally, a register must be opened in the US to register individuals who have committed these crimes, so that those individuals can be brought to justice through the International Court of Justice.