Mentions:
1: Lord Greenhalgh (CON - Life peer) ACM remediation programme and the building safety fund. - Speech Link
2: Baroness Hayman of Ullock (LAB - Life peer) recognise the Government’s efforts to increase the building safety fund, but unfortunately the amount - Speech Link
3: Lord Stunell (LDEM - Life peer) Only a small class of buildings will come under the new rules. - Speech Link
4: Baroness Brinton (LDEM - Life peer) should not be left to tackle non-compliance in buildings over 18m while simultaneously having to compete - Speech Link
5: Lord Kennedy of Southwark (LAB - Life peer) the fire safety order, the accountable person under the Building Safety Bill, and how that comes together - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Marie Rimmer (LAB - St Helens South and Whiston) Q I am particularly interested in the building safety fund. - Speech Link
2: Daisy Cooper (LDEM - St Albans) The building safety fund is hugely welcome. - Speech Link
3: None The Bill does not include the building safety fund, so could we perhaps not focus on that too much? - Speech Link
4: None she was referring not to the building safety fund but to the affordability of repayments. - Speech Link
5: Daisy Cooper (LDEM - St Albans) -18m building just to be able to move out. - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Robert Jenrick (CON - Newark) with non-ACM unsafe cladding will receive support of the same form through the building safety fund, - Speech Link
2: Karen Buck (LAB - Westminster North) , under a threat to their own personal safety and under the fear of being trapped in unsellable, non-mortgageable - Speech Link
3: Paul Maynard (CON - Blackpool North and Cleveleys) I have written to the building safety Minister asking for the Bill to include a mandate for the British - Speech Link
4: Rachel Hopkins (LAB - Luton South) The Government’s building safety fund excludes buildings under 18 metres, it is not distributed on the - Speech Link
5: Daniel Zeichner (LAB - Cambridge) should not be left to tackle non-compliance in buildings over 18m while simultaneously having to compete - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Clive Betts (LAB - Sheffield South East) Does the Minister accept that buildings under 11 metres, which are not covered by the building safety - Speech Link
2: Mike Amesbury (LAB - Weaver Vale) the building safety fund? - Speech Link
3: Tim Farron (LDEM - Westmorland and Lonsdale) the building safety fund? - Speech Link
4: Caroline Lucas (GRN - Brighton, Pavilion) the building safety fund? - Speech Link
5: Stephen Doughty (LAB - Cardiff South and Penarth) the building safety fund? - Speech Link
6: Patricia Gibson (SNP - North Ayrshire and Arran) establishment of a comprehensive building safety fund to cover the cost of all remediation works on buildings - Speech Link
7: Luke Hall (CON - Thornbury and Yate) Our building safety fund will remove unsafe non-ACM cladding on high-rise buildings, get that cladding - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Jim Fitzpatrick (LAB - Poplar and Limehouse) Sprinklers are needed to improve fire safety in the UK’s buildings. - Speech Link
2: Andy Slaughter (LAB - Hammersmith) new and converted residential buildings…and in all existing residential buildings above 18m from ground - Speech Link
3: Sarah Jones (LAB - Croydon Central) Will they consider a fire safety fund that is available to help council and housing association landlords - Speech Link
4: Kit Malthouse (CON - North West Hampshire) Members about wider work that is under way on fire safety. - Speech Link
5: Kit Malthouse (CON - North West Hampshire) priority, we are now moving into a phase of testing a range of non-ACM cladding, such as zinc and high-pressure - Speech Link
Mentions:
1: Kit Malthouse (CON - North West Hampshire) landlords to fund the removal and replacement of unsafe ACM cladding.However, I regret that remediation - Speech Link
2: Kit Malthouse (CON - North West Hampshire) If we were to extend his thinking, we might say that we do not actually want anybody in a wooden building - Speech Link